Over the past few years I have become a
great proponent of the growth mind-set view that ability isn’t fixed (see
Dweck, 2012) but rather can be grown through the correctly applied effort. However
not all see things this way.
I find it easy to comprehend how spectators
viewing world class performance, only see the most prominent tip of the ice
berg and fail to comprehend the vast number of hours and hard work that have
gone into shaping that performance. Cambliss (1989) writes in his article on
the ‘Mundanity of Excellence’ how the label of talent is oft used to explain
what isn’t understood and mask the concrete actions that define excellence. How
can a casual tennis fan comprehend the vast amount of effort Andy Murray or
Novak Djokovic have put in, to be able to execute some of the millimetre perfect
shots performed with the pressure of a grand slam final hanging over them?
I am also unsurprised if someone who has
played a sport most of their life, reached a level and then plateaued, finds it
easy to believe those that surpass their levels apparently within little time
and effort are endowed with greater genetic ‘gifts’ than they were. While they
may notice the vastly different quantitative amount of experience a competitor
took to achieve the same level as they did. It is all too easy to fail to
notice the qualitative differences in how they spent that time. As Ericcsson. outlines
in his theory of deliberate practice not all practice is equal. To adapt the
old adage ‘practice doesn’t make perfect’ however deliberate practice will (see
Ericsson et al., 2008).
What does take me a little by surprise, is
when I read about a top sports man or woman who believes that abilities are
fixed and natural talent has a big part to play in success. Shouldn’t the hard road to the top have taught
them differently? According to Dweck someone with a fixed mind-set would
unlikely be able to make it to the top. This contradiction has got me thinking
that a bit of a fixed mind-set may be an advantage?
The two sailors I have read articles from
that have got me thinking are Eilidh McIntyre and Robert Scheidt. Eilidh
McIntyre is a world class 470 crew who just missed selection for the British squad
to the Rio Olympics. Despite working hard to achieve the level she has, and
facing setbacks with the positive attitude that she can learn and improve from
them, she believes she has a natural talent for sailing which is largely attributable
to her success. How could this be? I have two theories; her father is a former Olympian,
the belief that she has the same talent as her father would lead her to the
belief that she too could make it to the Olympics. This could be motivating and
help foster confidence in high pressure races and events, the belief that you
were born able to do this could take a lot of pressure off and help
performances. On the other side, from her early days of sailing she had a top
level sailor to guide her training techniques. Unknowingly she avoided many
pitfalls and avoided wasting hours on fruitless practice. Quality practice
helped her fast track past all of her peers giving the illusion of an innate
talent to all observing including Eilidh.
For Robert Scheidt the situation is
different, a multiple Olympic medallist and world champion he doesn’t believe
he is a natural! However, he believes many around him are. In an article he
claims his wife an ex Olympic Laser radial sailor is a natural talent and has
to work a lot less than he does. This theme I have found in a number of other
autobiographies and writings of world class sportsmen. There is a belief that they
have to work harder than competitors to achieve the same standards. This iceberg
effect I expected to see in novices to a sport but in world class professionals
it seems odd. Could it be that a bit of a belief that talent does exist and they
don’t have it has led the best in the world to work that bit harder than their
competitors?
Carol Dweck puts across a compelling
argument that a growth mind-set is a key attribute for success while a fixed
mind-set and the belief that ability is fixed, is likely to lead to a lack of
grit when the going gets tough and a quitter. However rather than being binary as
Dweck suggests, does mind-set sit more along a continuum and while an extreme fixed
mind-set may be detrimental to performance could an element of a fixed mind-set
actually be beneficial to performance.
I am a big fan of the work of Mathew Syed
and his book Bounce was a life changing read for me, however he seems to fail to
recognise the contradiction he makes in his book. He is a big follower of the
work of Dweck and the theory that holding beliefs that abilities are fixed is
detrimental to resilience. However, he was the number one ranked table tennis
player in Britain, and openly talks about how he believed that natural talent was
largely to account for his success. Perhaps the belief that he had been gifted
with superhuman reflexes helped at a psychological level when competing?
I would conclude that mind-set is
important, but many other factors come into play for the aspiring athlete, and
certain mixes lead to elite performances that contradict Dweck’s mind-set
theory. Possibly where mind-set plays a bigger role is how the parents and coaches
view a young sports person’s performances, I would be interested to see how
Elidh McIntyre’s father and coaches responded to poor results? I would expect
that they largely displayed a positive attitude to failure which developed a
growth mind-set towards failure in Eilidh? Haimovitz and Dweck (2016) allude to this in their most recent work.
After digging up more questions than
answers I continue in my search of what separates the best from the rest.
Andy Kerr
Sailing Coach and Student of Psychology.
References
Dweck, C. S. (2012). Mindset. London : Robinson, 2012.
ERICSSON, K. A.,
PRIETULA, M. J., & COKELY, E. T. (2008). The Making of an Expert. ASCA
Newsletter, 2008(11),
18-26.
Haimovitz, K.,
& Dweck, C. S. (2016). What Predicts Children’s Fixed and Growth
Intelligence Mind- Sets? Not Their
Parents’ Views of Intelligence but Their Parents’ Views of Failure. Psychological Science (Sage
Publications Inc.), 27(6), 859-869.
Syed, M. (2011). Bounce: The Myth of Talent and the Power of Practice.